http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/ A Source for Computer and Internet Technology News and Articles Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:44:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-116 Jawwad Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:52:42 +0000 http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-116 Nirmal: I think memory consumption will not be a big issue on most computers as long as you don't install/start the third party software provided with it. If you do so then It will consume a lot of memory in the background as in case of VTP 8.0 :cry: Nirmal: I think memory consumption will not be a big issue on most computers as long as you don’t install/start the third party software provided with it. If you do so then It will consume a lot of memory in the background as in case of VTP 8.0

]]> http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-115 Nirmal Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:07:22 +0000 http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-115 This looks good to me, but how about the memory hog compared to VT pack? This looks good to me, but how about the memory hog compared to VT pack?

]]>