<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If VistaMizer is Better than Vista Transformation Pack 8.0 for your Windows XP Skinning Needs ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/</link>
	<description>Your Source for Technology News and Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>Sir, its really nice..thanks for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, its really nice..thanks for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jawwad</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jawwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Nirmal: I think memory consumption will not be a big issue on most computers as long as you don&#039;t install/start the third party software provided with it. If you do so then It will consume a lot of memory in the background as in case of VTP 8.0 :cry:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nirmal: I think memory consumption will not be a big issue on most computers as long as you don&#8217;t install/start the third party software provided with it. If you do so then It will consume a lot of memory in the background as in case of VTP 8.0 :cry:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2008/02/18/if-vistamizer-is-better-than-vista-transformation-pack-80-for-your-windows-xp-skinning-needs/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>This looks good to me, but how about the memory hog compared to VT pack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks good to me, but how about the memory hog compared to VT pack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 627/631 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.inspiredgeek.com

Served from: www.inspiredgeek.com @ 2012-02-11 01:48:53 -->
